![]() ![]() Md5sum() has existed forever, but needs you to do theĭownload. > I think you're calculating the md5 of the filename, not > the same signature as per your two lines. > installer (ie the file I've just downloaded) I again get > - If I run 'md5sum' on my local copy of the 78182 > firewalls are > tampering with downloads: > Try to verify the md5 of the installer some enterprise > question below about the md5 stuff, though: > installation- but 10 minutes later they're gone. > and the two dot-exe files are there immediately after I tried again with the 78172 build that you used, ![]() Apparently, to avoid this in the future, I need to run new programs from a specific folder. As I write this, they are having a sale that. So, after 4 phone calls and multiple attempts at fixing this problem, my institutional IT department were today able to disable the antivirus block that was preventing R and R Studio from working. > (without it having the politeness to actually tell me, You need to set up an account with them first, before you install it. > problem with your system > permissions or antivirus that > I just tested this and as far as I can tell there are > Cc: R-Devel-2 Subject: Re: missing binaries in > April 2020 21:32 To: Bravington, Mark (Data61, Hobart) Both are present in its bin/圆4 folder (and in > files in its bin/i386 folder: Rterm.exe and > dot-exe installer- seems to be missing a couple of > The "r-devel snapshot build" 78175 on Windows- a > On Fri, at 2:42 AM Bravington, Mark (Data61, Subject: Re: missing binaries in R-devel windows snapshot 78175 I am a long-time fan of tools::md5sum(), and in fact it's used in a package of ours planned for release soon- bit disconcerting to hear it's actually broken! However, I suspect R4.0 will be released before our package sees the light of day.įrom: R-devel on behalf of Martin Maechler Ĭc: Bravington, Mark (Data61, Hobart) R-Devel-2 Indeed, I did use tools::md5sum() it was the apparent difference between that and openssl::md5() that surprised me. > Don't use tools::md5sum() in portable code, though, at least not just yet, because it is broken on non-ASCII filenames on Windows. ![]() > I think you're calculating the md5 of the filename, not the file. Binaries all present and correct after all (on my Cylance-free machine), and checksums working as they should. Thanks all- my fault again, this time for not reading the openssl::md5() documentation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |